Executive Functioning

Write a 3-5 page paper that answers the following questions: What are executive functioning skills?How might the lack of age-appropriate executive functioning skills present in the classroom?What can you do as a teacher to help build students’ executive functioning skills? For purposes of this assignment, you can choose 3-5 skills on which to focus. Be sure to fully answer the question and consider the categories of the rubric in order to earn full points. You should use a minimum of three (3) sources and cite them in the paper and on a reference page using APA. The total for this paper is 35 points. Rubric Research Report: Executive Functioning Research Report: Executive Functioning CriteriaRatingsPts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeOrganization 5 to >4.0 pts Full Marks Information is very organized with well-constructed paragraphs and subheadings. 4 to >3.0 pts Good Information is organized with well-constructed paragraphs. 3 to >1.0 pts Fair Information is organized, but paragraphs are not well-constructed. 1 to >0 pts Poor The information appears to be disorganized. 5 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeQuality of Information 5 to >4.0 pts Full Marks Information clearly relates to the main topic. It includes several supporting details and/or examples. 4 to >3.0 pts Good Information clearly relates to the main topic. It provides 1-2 supporting details and/or examples. 3 to >1.0 pts Fair Information clearly relates to the main topic. No details and/or examples are given. 1 to >0 pts Poor Information has little or nothing to do with the main topic. 5 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCitations 5 to >4.0 pts Full Marks A variety of reliable In text citations and reference list in APA format (minimum of 3). 4 to >3.0 pts Good A few in-text citations or references were included (1-2 sources). 3 to >1.0 pts Fair References were used that are not reliable. OR Either in-text citations or reference page are missing. OR Citations or references do not follow APA formatting, but the students tried to meet APA guidelines. 1 to >0 pts Poor Information is not cited properly. OR Both in-text citations and reference page are missing. OR Citations and references do not remotely resemble APA 5 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeEF Defined 5 to >4.0 pts Full Marks The concept of EF is exceptionally well defined and cited appropriately. 4 to >3.0 pts Good The concept of EF is well defined and cited appropriately. 3 to >1.0 pts Fair The concept of EF is somewhat defined and cited appropriately. 1 to >0 pts Poor The concept of EF is poorly defined and cited appropriately. 5 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeUnderdevelopment of EF Skills Explained 5 to >4.0 pts Full Marks The concept of underdeveloped EF is exceptionally well explained and cited appropriately. 4 to >3.0 pts Good The concept of underdeveloped EF is well explained and cited appropriately. 3 to >1.0 pts Fair The concept of underdeveloped EF is somewhat explained and cited appropriately. 1 to >0 pts Poor The concept of underdeveloped EF is poorly explained and cited. 5 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeBoosting EF Skills 5 to >4.0 pts Full Marks The concept of boosting EF is exceptionally well explained and cited appropriately. 4 to >3.0 pts Good The concept of boosting EF is well explained and cited appropriately. 3 to >1.0 pts Fair The concept of boosting EF is somewhat explained and cited appropriately. 1 to >0 pts Poor The concept of boosting EF is poorly explained and cited. 5 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeMechanics 5 to >4.0 pts Full Marks No grammatical, spelling or punctuation errors. 4 to >3.0 pts Good Almost no grammatical, spelling or punctuation errors 3 to >1.0 pts Fair A few grammatical spelling, or punctuation errors. 1 to >0 pts Poor Many grammatical, spelling, or punctuation errors. 5 pts Total Points: 35